Eli Rose 's postsabout code projects quotesmedia log
Math Problem Liveblogging #1

Background

This is an experiment where I narrate my thought process as I solve a math problem. My goal: writeups of the solutions to math problems usually present a polished, streamlined version of the solver's thought process that omits errors, wrong turns, and heuristics. I wondered what it would be like to represent the thought process "warts and all."

In full disclosure, I didn't get the idea to liveblog my solving of this problem until after the "IS THAT IT??" insight, so the beginning is my attempt to reconstruct what I was thinking then.

I encountered today's problem here.

Problem

Prove that if $a$, $b$, and $c$ are odd integers, then the roots of $ax^2 + bx + c = 0$ are irrational.

  • Interesting; so this means that the graph of $ax^2 + bx + c$ never intersects the x-axis at an integer point.

    • Not sure how to proceed from that; maybe we need to do something algebraic.
  • Oh, obviously we can use the quadratic formula. $\frac{b^2 - 4ac}{2a}$. No, $\frac{-b \pm \sqrt{b^2 - 4ac}}{2a}$. The part that matters is inside the square root. We just need $b^2 - 4ac$ not to be a perfect square; if it isn't a perfect square, then neither will the roots be.

  • Okay; we have that $a, b, c$ are odd integers. They can be negative or positive, I notice.

  • Well, an odd integer squared is still odd. So $b^2$ is odd. And $4ac$ is even, since it's an even number times an odd number times an odd number.

    • Is that right? Yes, it is, because evenness spreads like poision during multiplication (remember this via $1 \times 0 = 0$, odd times even is even).

    • Okay, so $b^2 - 4ac$ is an odd minus an even, so it's odd.

    • Wait; this doesn't get us anywhere. I don't care whether it's odd or not; I care whether it's a square.

  • Unsure what to do.

  • Okay, let's try with some actual numbers. I need two squares and I know one of them has to be odd; let's use 9 for our odd square. I'll take another square — say 25 — and try to subtract enough to get it to 9.

    • What do I have to subtract? Right; 16.

    • Okay; that won't work. I have to get $4ac$ to equal 16, but both $a$ and $c$ are odd whereas I need them both to be 2 in order to get 16.

  • Is there some sort of argument about how large the numbers can get? Like, if it's below 100 I can't hit it in this way, if it's above I can't hit it in another way? Some sort of bipartite argument.

    • No, that's tough because there are two things that vary; the large square which I'm subtracting $4ac$ from and the small square I'm trying to hit.
  • Let's choose another example. What's the next biggest square after 25? 36. Okay, I can't subtract from 36 to get to 25 because I'd have to subtract 11, and that's too big to be hit by $4ac$, I've already seen that.

    • Can I subtract to get to 9? No, I'd have to subtract 27, and that doesn't work either.

    • Wait, there's another reason why these don't work; the amounts I'd have to subtract are all odd, but I need them to equal $4ac$.

    • IS THAT IT??

  • Right; when you list squares they look like this: 0, 1, 4, 9, 16 ... and the deltas look like this: 1, 3, 5, 7 ...

    • It's all the odd numbers.

    • Imagine a sentence in the written-up proof. "Consider the set of differences of squares..." Is it generally the case that the difference of any two squares is an odd number? Not just counting consecutive ones.

    • I don't think so; for example $49 - 9 = 40$ is not odd.

  • Perhaps we have to use the fact that $b^2$ is odd. But it's troubling that $40$ is not odd in the example above.

    • Why doesn't the example above work? That is, why can't we have $b^2 = 49$ and $4ac = 40$? Well, $a$ would need to be $5$ and $c$ would need to be $2$ for that to work, but $c$ can't be $2$. So we're saved, but how are we saved in general?
  • Okay, let's dive into the algebra. $b$ is odd, so say it's $2k + 1$.

    • Then $b^2 = (2k + 1)^2 = 4k^2 + 4k + 1$.

    • I guess we'll subtract a square out and show that the result is not even? Or subtract an even number out and show that the result is not a square?

    • First one seems easier. But wait; how to subtract a square out?

    • Okay, let's try the second one.

    • Hmm, how do I subtract an even number out? I feel like that trailing 1 is giving me what I want. But... $4k^2 + 4k$ will be an even + an even = an even, so if I leave that out I get 1, which is a square.

      • Why doesn't this present a counterexample? Perhaps we simply can't find $a, c$ such that $4ac = 4k^2 + 4k$, but I am at a loss as to why.
  • Feel like I've taken a bad turn somewhere. Let's lay out what we've got in algebra. Also, let me head into another room.

    • We need to show that $b^2 - 4ac \ne d^2$, where $a, b, c$ are odd integers and $d$ is any integer.

    • We can rewrite this into $b^2 - d^2 = 4ac$ and trying to show a contradiction, which is the direction we were going above. "It would be absurb to take an odd square, subtract a square from it, and get $4ac$" (the product of two odd integers and 4).

    • What can we say about the differences of squares? Are they ever just 4 (so $a = c = 1$)? Well, no, as I laid out above there are no consecutive squares distance 4 apart, and the non-consecutive ones are too far apart to be 4 apart.

    • Can we just do odd and even? We know $b^2$ is odd, so subtract another square from it. If we subtract an even square, the result is odd and can't be $4ac$. If we subtract an odd square, things get more interesting...

    • Can we guarantee anything about relative size of $b$ and $d$? I don't think so...

  • Subtract an odd square from an odd square. Say, $4k^2 + 4k + 1 - (4j^2 + 4j + 1)$. The $1$s go away and we can take out a 4, so $4(k^2 + k - j^2 - j)$. We want to show this can't be $4ac$?

    • Well, $k^2 + k$ is even regardless of what $k$ is, since it's odd plus odd. And same goes for $j^2 + j$. So it's 4 times an even minus an even = an even; a poor fit for $4ac$, I suppose.
  • This seems like it. But how to we justify that this cannot be $4ac$?

    • Oh, we can simply divide by $4$. So, when you divide $4ac$ by 4 the result is odd; when you divide $4(k^2 + k - j^2 - j)$ by 4 we know that the result is even. Hence they are different.
  • (Took a break)

  • Great, I think we can write up the final solution now.

Solution

By the quadratic formula, we just need to prove that $b^2 - 4ac$ is not a perfect square. We proceed by contradiction. Suppose it were; that is, suppose $b^2 - 4ac = d^2$, where $d$ is any integer. Rearrange: $b^2 - d^2 = 4ac$. There are two cases to consider: if $d$ is even, and if $d$ is odd.

  • If $d$ is even, then $d^2$ is even. But then the left-hand side is odd (odd - even) and the right side is even, so there is a contradiction.

  • If $d$ is odd, then write $2k + 1$ for $b$ and $2j + 1$ for $d$, where $j, k$ are any integer. Expanding, we get

$$b^2 - d^2 \rightarrow 4k^2 + 4k + 1 - (4j^2 + 4j + 1) \rightarrow 4(k^2 + k - j^2 - j) = 4ac$$

  • Divide both sides by 4; $k^2 + k - j^2 - j = ac$

  • Now, observe that the quantity $k^2 + k$ must be even, since $k^2$ has the same parity as $k$. Same with $j^2 - j$. Therefore left-hand side $k^2 + k - j^2 - j$ is even.

  • But the right-hand side $ac$ is an odd number multiplied by an odd number and is therefore odd. Hence, a contradiction.

Learnings

The difference of two odd squares is always a multiple of four; that's pretty interesting. (Furthermore, it's four times an even number, so I guess it's a multiple of eight.) I suppose the difference of two even squares is a multiple of four as well.